wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained
wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights even though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking in the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found being not maintainable and it is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
14. During the light on the position explained above, it can be concluded that a civil servant features a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the duration of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of at some point while in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness from the alleged prevalence and the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to be the real brothers in the deceased but they didn't react in the slightest degree to the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does check here not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a great number of situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is often a weak variety of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding existence of some light within the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners collectively over a motorcycle at 4.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
“Ensuring the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple trustworthy sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
The case addresses An array of issues like, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation from the right to life.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty with the accused who intentionally murdered the target.
The Court deemed the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (3) Because the danger and encroachment alleged were like to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
department concerned shall supply the complete set of ACRs on the concerned officer to DPC very well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station as a result of possible health risks and dangers.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and security. It demonstrates the commitment of your state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.
She did note that the boy still needed extensive therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to get to the point of being Risk-free with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved on the actions.
In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and a hundred and twenty on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.